A possible use, in a 2016 review
This is a review. The publication page gives 19 Jan 2016. It describes a possible use. It does not name a system the NHS was running, and it does not say an authority had adopted a ledger.
The report is by the UK Government Chief Scientific Adviser. In the NHS, the technology could improve health care by making the delivery of services easier to check, and by sharing records securely under exact rules. People could, depending on the circumstances, control who sees their records and know who has looked.
Applications were being explored in healthcare, including patient records. The technologies were very early. Many problems, including privacy, speed and the ability to grow, were still unsolved.
A case study on registering assets says a distributed ledger could be applied to smart contracts and to recording who owns an asset. The examples include NHS health data, alongside intellectual property, wills, notary services and pensions. People could have more control over data such as health data, and could check whether it had been used for the right reasons. For that to happen, local and national authorities would have to adopt the technology. The review does not say one had.
- Source: Distributed ledger technology: beyond block chain, Government Office for Science, executive summary; chapter 2; chapter 6, case 4 · read 22 Oct 2026
- Source: Distributed ledger technology: Blackett review, Government Office for Science, on GOV.UK (19 Jan 2016), publication page · read 22 Oct 2026
Technical detail
“Performance and scalability” is the review's list, with privacy. “Asset registration” is its phrase. The same report's case study of a European energy market is on the energy page. Its sentences about land registries are on the public records page. Neither is repeated here. The case study's own adjective for a proof of record was not copied.